UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
|
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
For the transition period
from to
Commission file number 001-15757
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
33-0224167
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
Organization)
|
|
|
10883 Thornmint Road
San Diego, CA 92127
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
(858) 673-8600
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes o No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large
accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
| |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-12 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares of
Common Stock, with $0.01 par value, outstanding on April 27, 2010 was
22,785,911.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC. INDEX
|
PART I.
|
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
3
|
| |
|
ITEM
1.
|
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
3
|
| |
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2008
|
3
|
| |
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)
|
4
|
| |
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)
|
5
|
| |
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)
|
6
|
| |
|
|
|
Notes
to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
7
|
| |
|
ITEM
2.
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
19
|
| |
|
ITEM
4.
|
|
Controls
and
Procedures
|
28
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II.
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
29
|
| |
|
ITEM
1A.
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
29
|
| |
|
ITEM
6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
31
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
32
|
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, except share amounts)
| |
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
| |
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $28 (unaudited)
and $28 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Pension
assets
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
5,340 |
|
|
$ |
5,237 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
$ |
2,388 |
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
Notes
payable to related parties
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
5,111 |
|
|
|
5167 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
note payable, net of discount
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Additional
financing obligation, net of discount
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Pension
obligation
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
7,109 |
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B
convertible redeemable preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated
750,000 shares, 389,400 shares issued, and 239,400 shares
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008;
liquidation preference $645 and $632 at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Series C
convertible non-redeemable preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated
3,500 shares, 2,500 shares issued, and 2,200 shares outstanding at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008; liquidation preference
$2,647 and $2,604 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Series D
convertible non-redeemable preferred stock, $0.01 par value; designated
3,000 shares, 2,198 shares issued, and 2,198 shares outstanding at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008; liquidation preference
$2,472 and $2,428 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,163,487
(unaudited) and 18,163,487 shares issued at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, and 18,156,783 (unaudited)
and 18,156,783 shares outstanding at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
86,316 |
|
|
|
86,007 |
|
|
Treasury
stock, at cost - 6,704 shares
|
|
|
(64
|
) |
|
|
(64
|
) |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(88,249 |
) |
|
|
(87,201 |
) |
|
Total
Shareholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
$ |
5,340 |
|
|
$ |
5,237 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| |
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
|
|
| |
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
| |
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General &
administrative
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
Research &
development
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(838
|
) |
|
|
(1,937
|
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense (income), net
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(5
|
) |
|
Change in fair
value of financing obligation
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
income, net
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
Loss
from operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,048
|
) |
|
|
(1,904
|
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,904 |
) |
|
Preferred
dividends
|
|
|
(99
|
) |
|
|
(84
|
) |
|
Amortization
of beneficial conversion feature on preferred stocks
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
Net
loss available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(1,147 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,782 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share — see Note 2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
Preferred
Dividends
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Beneficial
conversion feature on preferred stocks
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share - see Note 2
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
18,156,783 |
|
|
|
17,836,698 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
| |
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
| |
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,904 |
) |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
Amortization
of debt discount and debt issuance costs
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Change
in fair value of additional financing obligation
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
Change
in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(208
|
) |
|
Inventory,
net
|
|
|
(51
|
) |
|
|
(95
|
) |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(53
|
) |
|
Pension
assets
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(63
|
) |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
(69
|
) |
|
|
639 |
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(84
|
) |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(127
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Pension
obligation
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
Total
adjustments
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5
|
) |
|
|
(26
|
) |
|
Acquisition
of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of notes payable with warrants
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Financing
issuance costs of notes payable
|
|
|
(155
|
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Proceeds
from exercised stock purchase warrants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
542 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(743
|
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Summary
of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued with notes payable
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Discount
on note payable
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Beneficial
conversion feature of series C and D preferred stock
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
(In Thousands)
| |
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
|
|
| |
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,904 |
) |
|
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
|
$ |
(1,046 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,943 |
) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND
OPERATIONS
ImageWare
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) is a leader in the emerging market
for software-based identity management solutions, providing biometric,
secure credential, law enforcement and enterprise authorization.
Our “flagship” product is the IWS Biometric Engine. Scalable for
small city business or worldwide deployment, our biometric engine is a
multi-biometric platform that is hardware and algorithm independent,
enabling the enrollment and management of unlimited population
sizes. Our identification products are used to manage and issue
secure credentials, including national IDs, passports, driver licenses,
smart cards and access control credentials. Our law enforcement products
provide law enforcement with integrated mug shot, fingerprint LiveScan
and investigative capabilities. We also provide comprehensive
authentication security software. Biometric technology is now an
integral part of all markets we address, and all of our products are
integrated into the Biometric Engine Platform. Elements of the IWS
Biometric Engine can be used as investigative tools for law enforcement
utilizing multiple biometrics and forensic data elements, and to
enhance security and authenticity of public and private sector
credentials.
Our
biometric technology is a core software component of an organization’s
security infrastructure and includes a multi-biometric identity
management solution for enrolling, managing, identifying and verifying
the identities of people by the physical characteristics of the human
body. We develop, sell and support various identity management
capabilities within government (federal, state and local), law
enforcement, commercial enterprises, and transportation and aviation
markets for identification and verification purposes. Our IWS Biometric
Engine is a biometric identity management platform for multi-biometric
enrollment, management and authentication, managing population databases
of virtually unlimited sizes. It is also offered as a Software
Development Kit (SDK) based search engine, enabling developers and
system integrators to implement a biometric solution or integrate
biometric capabilities into existing applications without having to
derive biometric functionality from pre-existing applications. The
IWS Biometric Engine combined with our secure credential platform, IWS
EPI Builder, provides a comprehensive, integrated biometric and secure
credential solution that can be leveraged for high-end applications such
as passports, driver licenses, national IDs, and other secure
documents. It can also be utilized within our law enforcement systems to
incorporate any number of various multiple biometrics into one system.
The
Company recently added next generation voice recognition, multilingual
speech translation and voice analytics capabilities to our suite of
biometric identity management solutions, enabling users to facilitate
and improve communication across major language groups globally. The
ImageWare Mediator products are offered stand-alone or integrated with
our Biometric Engine platform providing an advanced multilingual
communications capability. Government, intelligence, defense, public
safety and border control customers are able to realize language
translation and voice recognition capabilities whereby an
English-speaking user can understand and be understood in numerous
languages including Spanish, German, French, Korean, Arabic and Polish,
among others. ImageWare Mediator products support speech to speech
translation, multilingual collaboration, conversational environments,
which are represented for both voice and text and include biometric
functionality for speaker identification and voice analytics.
Our
law enforcement solutions enable agencies to quickly capture, archive,
search, retrieve, and share digital images, fingerprints and criminal
history records on a stand-alone, networked, wireless or Web-based
platform. We develop, sell and support a suite of modular software
products used by law enforcement and public safety agencies to create
and manage criminal history records and to investigate crime. Our IWS
Law Enforcement solution consists of six software modules: a Capture and
Investigative module, which provides a criminal booking system and
related database; a Facial Recognition module, which uses biometric
facial recognition to identify suspects; a Suspect ID module, which
facilitates the creation of full-color, photo-realistic suspect
composites; a Wireless module, which provides access to centrally stored
records over the Internet in a connected or wireless fashion; a PDA
add-on module, which enables access to centrally stored records while in
the field on a handheld Pocket PC compatible device combined with
central repository services which allows for inter-agency data sharing
on a local, regional, and/or national level; and a LiveScan module,
which incorporates LiveScan capabilities into IWS Law Enforcement
providing integrated fingerprint and palm print biometric management for
civil and law enforcement use.
Our
Secure Credential ID solutions empower customers to create secure and
smart digital identification documents with complete ID systems. We
develop, sell and support software and design systems which utilize
digital imaging in the production of photo identification cards and
credentials and identification systems. Our products in this market
consist of IWS EPI Suite, IWS EPI Builder (SDK) and Identifier for
Windows. These products allow for the production of digital
identification cards and related databases and records and can be used
by, among others, schools, airports, hospitals, corporations or
governments. We have added the ability to incorporate multiple
biometrics into the ID systems with the integration of IWS Biometric
Engine to our Secure Credential ID product line.
Our
enterprise authentication software includes the IWS Desktop Security
product which is a comprehensive authentication management
infrastructure solution providing added layers of security to
workstations, networks and systems through advanced encryption and
authentication technologies. IWS Desktop Security is optimized to
enhance network security and usability, and uses multi-factor
authentication methods to protect access, verify identity and help
secure the computing environment without sacrificing ease-of-use
features such as quick login. Additionally, IWS Desktop Security
provides an easy integration with various smart card-based credentials
including the Common Access Card (CAC), Homeland Security Presidential
Directive 12 (HSPD-12), Personal Identity Verification (PIV) credential,
and Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) with an
organization’s access control process. IWS Desktop Security provides the
crucial end-point component of a Logical Access Control System (LACS),
and when combined with a Physical Access Control System (PACS),
organizations benefit from a complete door to desktop access control and
security model.
Basis of Presentation
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
The
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 has been derived from the Company’s audited
balance sheet included in the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and
the condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements of ImageWare
have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial
reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for
annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2008, and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2010. In the opinion
of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of adjustments of a
normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the
Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2009, and its results
of operations for the periods presented. These condensed consolidated
unaudited financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2009
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
entire year.
Going Concern
As
reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the
Company has continuing losses, negative working capital and negative
cash flows from operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In
May 2008, the AMEX removed the Company’s common stock from being
listed on their exchange as we failed to comply with AMEX’s continued
listing standards. In December of 2008 our common stock was
removed from being quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board as we
failed to make the required filings with the SEC in the required
timeframe. As of the end of the third quarter of 2008, we
were faced with limited funds for operations and were compelled to
suspend SEC filings and the associated costs until such time as the
Company had sufficient resources to cover ongoing operations and the
expenses of maintaining compliance with SEC filing
requirements. There is no assurance that we will be
able to attain compliance with SEC filing requirements in the future,
and if we are able to attain compliance, there is no assurance we will
be able to maintain compliance. If we are not able to attain
and maintain compliance for minimum required periods, we will not be
eligible for re-listing on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or other
exchanges.
Despite
securing financing arrangements in 2008 and 2009, additional new
financing will be required to fund working capital and operations should
the Company be unable to generate positive cash flow from operations in
the near future. The Company is exploring the possible sale of equity
securities and/or debt financing. However, there can be no assurance
that additional financing will be available.
Insufficient
funds will require the Company to sell certain of the Company’s assets
or license the Company’s technologies to others and if the Company is
unable to obtain additional funding there is substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In
view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph,
recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued
operations of the Company, which, in turn, is dependent upon the
Company’s ability to continue to raise capital and generate positive
cash flows from operations. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and
classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classifications
of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to
continue its existence.
The
Company operates in markets that are emerging and highly competitive.
There is no assurance that the Company will operate at a profit or
generate positive cash flows in the future.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement
157 (“FSP FAS 157-2”). FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective
date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008. The provisions of FSP FAS 157-2 did not have an impact
on our results of operations or financial position.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business
Combinations” and SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements”. The standards are intended to
improve, simplify, and converge internationally the accounting for
business combinations and the reporting of non-controlling interests in
consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 141(R) requires
the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and
only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction;
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective
for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the
acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information
they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of
the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. The Company will apply SFAS 141(R) to business combinations
occurring after the effective date.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51 (“SFAS
No. 160”), which requires non-controlling interests
(previously referred to as minority interests) to be treated as a
separate component of equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is
prohibited. In addition, SFAS No. 160 shall be applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is
initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be
applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We do not have an
outstanding non-controlling interest in one or more subsidiaries and
therefore, SFAS No. 160 is not applicable to us at this time.
In
December 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF
on Issue No. 07-1 (“EITF 07-1”), Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements.
EITF 07-1 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009
and will be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for
all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. EITF
07-1 defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting
requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative
arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third
parties. The provisions of EITF 07-1 did not have an impact on our
financial position and results of operations.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 161”), which
is effective January 1, 2009. FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures
about derivative instruments and hedging activities to allow for a
better understanding of their effects on an entity’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. Among other things, FAS 161
requires disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and
associated gains and losses in a tabular format. Since FAS 161 affects
only disclosure requirements, it has no effect on our results of
operations or financial position.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP FAS 142-3,
“Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS
142-3”). The FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The intent of the FSP is to
improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash
flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under other
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The guidance
for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset shall
be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the
effective date. Certain disclosure requirements shall be applied
prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent
to, the effective date. The Company will apply FSP FAS 142-3 to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The new standard is intended to
improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or
hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing
financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental
entities. FAS No. 162 is effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. Previous references to GAAP accounting standards will
no longer be used in our disclosures for financial statements ending
after the effective date. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have an
impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. APB
14-1, Accounting for
Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon
Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (“FSP APB 14-1”). FSP
APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled
in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not
addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible
Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Additionally,
this FSP specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately
account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will
reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest
cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption is not permitted. The provisions of FSP No. No. APB
14-1did not have a material impact on our results of operations or
financial position.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities,” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 states
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of
earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1
becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The
provisions of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1did not have a material impact on our
results of operations or financial position.
In
January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1, "Amendments to the
Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99 - Recognition of Interest
Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in
Securitized Financial Assets". FSP EITF 99-20-1 changes the impairment
model included within EITF 99-20 to be more consistent with the
impairment model of SFAS No. 115. FSP EITF 99-20-1 achieves this by
amending the impairment model in EITF 99-20 to remove its exclusive
reliance on "market participant" estimates of future cash flows used in
determining fair value. Changing the cash flows used to analyze
other-than-temporary impairment from the "market participant" view to a
holder's estimate of whether there has been a "probable" adverse change
in estimated cash flows allows companies to apply reasonable judgment in
assessing whether another-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The
adoption of FSP EITF 99-20-1 did not have a material impact on our
results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In
April 2009 the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1 Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise
from Contingencies, or FSP 141R-1. FSP 141R-1 amends the provisions in
SFAS 141R for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities
arising from contingencies in business combinations. The FSP eliminates
the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies,
including the initial recognition and measurement criteria in SFAS 141R
and instead carries forward most of the provisions in SFAS 141 for
acquired contingencies. FSP 141R-1 is effective for contingent assets
and contingent liabilities acquired in business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption
of FSP No. 141R-1 did not have a material impact on our results of
operations, financial position or liquidity.
In
April 2009 the FASB issued three related Staff Positions: (i) FSP No.
157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly, or FSP 157-4, (ii) FSP 115-2 and FSP
No. 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments , or FSP 115-2 and FSP 124-2, and (iii) FSP 107-1 and APB
No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
or FSP 107 and APB 28-1, which are effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009. FSP 157-4 provides guidance on how
to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities under SFAS 157 in
the current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a
fair value measurement remains an exit price. If we were to conclude
that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity of the asset or liability in relation to normal market
activities, quoted market values may not be representative of fair value
and the Company may conclude that a change in valuation technique or
the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. FSP 115-2
and FSP 124-2 modify the requirements for recognizing
other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities and revise the existing
impairment model for such securities, by modifying the current intent
and ability indicator in determining whether a debt security is
other-than-temporarily impaired. FSP 107 and APB 28-1 enhance the
disclosure of instruments under the scope of SFAS 157 for both interim
and annual periods. We do not expect the adoption of these
standards to have a material effect on our financial position of results
of operations.
In
May 2009 the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, or SFAS 165.
SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires
the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether the date
represents the date the financial statements were issued or were
available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective in the first interim
period ending after June 15, 2009. We expect that SFAS 165 will have an
impact on disclosures in our consolidated financial statements, but the
nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the
nature, terms and value of any subsequent events occurring after
adoption.
In
June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), or SFAS 167, that will change how we determine
when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled
through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. Under SFAS
No. 167, determining whether a company is required to consolidate an
entity will be based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and
design and a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity
that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. SFAS
167 is effective for financial statements after January 1, 2010. We are
currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 167 and the impact of
adoption on their consolidated financial statements, if any.
In June 2009 the FASB
issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting. SFAS No. 168 represents the
last numbered standard to be issued by FASB under the old
(pre-Codification) numbering system, and amends the GAAP hierarchy
established under SFAS No. 162. On July 1, 2009 the FASB launched FASB's
new Codification entitled The FASB Accounting Standards Codification,
or FASB ASC.
The Codification will
supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. SFAS
No. 168 is effective in the first interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. This pronouncement will have no effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption other than
current references to GAAP which will be replaced with references to the
applicable codification paragraphs.
In August 2009, the FASB
issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the
measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should
measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing
the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the
measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This
standard was effective on October 1, 2009. We do not expect the impact
of its adoption to be material to our financial statements.
In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued new revenue recognition standards for arrangements with multiple
deliverables, where certain of those deliverables are non-software
related. The new standards permit entities to initially use management’s
best estimate of selling price to value individual deliverables when
those deliverables do not have VSOE of fair value or when third-party
evidence is not available. Additionally, these new standards modify the
manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the
separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual
method of allocating arrangement consideration. These new standards are
effective for annual periods ending after June 15, 2010 and are
effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2011,
however early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting these new standards on its
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows,
including possible early adoption.
In October 2009, the
FASB issued new standards for the accounting for certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. These new standards amend
the scope of pre-existing software revenue guidance by removing from the
guidance non-software components of tangible products and certain
software components of tangible products. These new standards are
required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2011; however, early
adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect these new standards
to significantly impact the financial statements.
In January 2010, the
FASB issued amended standards that require additional fair value
disclosures. These amended standards require disclosures about inputs
and valuation techniques used to measure fair value as well as
disclosures about significant transfers, beginning in the first quarter
of 2010. Additionally, these amended standards require presentation of
disaggregated activity within the reconciliation for fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), beginning
in the first quarter of 2011. The Company does not expect these new
standards to significantly impact the financial statements.
A
variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are
currently under study by standard setting organizations and various
regulatory agencies. Due to the tentative and preliminary nature of
those proposed standards, management has not determined whether
implementation of such proposed standards would be material to the
consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior period balances in order
to conform to the current period presentation.
NOTE 2. NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic
loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss available to
common shareholders for the period by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common
share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common
shareholders for the period by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period, adjusted to include, if dilutive,
potential dilutive shares consisting of convertible preferred stock,
stock options and warrants, calculated using the treasury stock method.
During the periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has
excluded the following securities from the calculation of diluted loss
per share, as their effect would have been antidilutive due to the
Company’s net loss:
|
Potential Dilutive Securities:
|
|
Number of
Common Shares
Convertible into at
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Number of
Common Shares
Convertible into at
March 31, 2008
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
stock grants
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
|
|
205,255 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Convertible
preferred stock
|
|
|
10,213,156 |
|
|
|
3,633,384 |
|
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
2,306,288 |
|
|
|
2,127,954 |
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
14,971,167 |
|
|
|
6,721,385 |
|
The
table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share:
|
(Amounts in thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
| |
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss from operations
|
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,904 |
) |
|
Preferred
dividends
|
|
|
(99
|
) |
|
|
(84
|
) |
|
Beneficial
conversion feature on preferred stocks
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
Net
loss from operations available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(1,147 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,782 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic and diluted earnings per share — weighted-average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
18,156,783 |
|
|
|
17,836,698 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
Preferred
dividends
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Beneficial
conversion feature on preferred stocks
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
Net
loss available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
Preferred
stock dividends for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
were $99,000 and $1,878,000, respectively. Preferred stock
dividends for the three months ended March 31, 2008 contains
approximately $1,794,000 in preferred dividends attributable to an
embedded beneficial conversion feature recognized in conjunction with
the issuance of common stock pursuant to the Company’s warrant financing
transaction consummated in March 2008.
NOTE 3. INVENTORY
Inventories
at March 31, 2009 were comprised of work in process of $20,000
representing direct labor costs on in-process projects and finished
goods of $50,000 net of reserves for obsolete and slow-moving items of
$93,000. Inventories at December 31, 2008 were comprised of
work in process of $9,000 representing direct labor costs on in-process
projects and finished goods of $10,000 net of reserves for obsolete and
slow-moving items of $93,000. Appropriate consideration is
given to obsolescence, excessive levels, deterioration, and other
factors in evaluating net realizable value and required reserve levels.
NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS
157”). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of FAS 157
were adopted January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB staff
issued Staff Position No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” (“FSP FAS 157-2”). FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective
date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The
provisions of FSP FAS 157-2 were effective for the Company’s fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2009.
FAS
157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the
highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels
of the fair value hierarchy under FAS 157 are described below:
| |
Level 1
|
Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
|
| |
Level 2
|
Level
2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other
than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which
significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from,
or corroborated by, observable market data.
|
| |
Level 3
|
Prices
or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant
to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or
no market activity).
|
The
following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and
liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value
hierarchy. As required by FAS 157, assets and liabilities are classified
in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement.
|
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2009
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
financing obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company’s Pension assets are classified within Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy because they are valued using market prices. The Pension
assets are valued based on market prices in active markets and are
primarily comprised of the cash surrender value of insurance contracts.
All plan assets are managed in a policyholder pool in Germany by outside
investment managers. The investment objectives for the plan
are the preservation of capital, current income and long-term growth of
capital.
The
fair value of the Company’s secured notes payable and additional
financing obligation are classified within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy because they are valued using pricing models that incorporate
management assumptions that cannot be corroborated with observable
market data. The Company obtains pricing information from an
independent pricing vendor. The pricing vendor uses various
pricing models that are consistent with what other market participants
would use. The inputs and assumptions to the models used by
the pricing vendor include the following: benchmark yields, issuer
spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and other market-related
data. The methodology of the pricing vendor uses available
information applicable such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like
securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. The
application of such methodologies include the computation of market
yield, credit risk return and illiquidity return used as inputs to the
pricing models.
The
fair value of the Company’s secured notes payable and additional
financing obligation are classified within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy because they are valued using pricing models that incorporate
management assumptions that cannot be corroborated with observable
market data. The Company uses various pricing models that are
consistent with what other market participants would
use. The inputs and assumptions to the models include the
following: benchmark yields, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids,
offers and other market-related data. The methodology uses
available information applicable such as benchmark curves, benchmarking
of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. The
application of such methodologies includes the computation of market
yield, credit risk return and illiquidity return used as inputs to the
pricing models.
Other
significant assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the note
and the additional financing obligation include the application of the
Black-Scholes option pricing model used to value the warrants issued to
the Lender. The determination of fair value of the warrants
issued to the lender using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is
affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding the
expected stock price volatility over the term of the warrants. The
Company calculated the expected volatility assumption required in the
Black-Scholes model based on the historical volatility of the Company’s
stock.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS
159”). FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value, with the objective of
improving financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported
earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently
without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The
provisions of FAS 159 were adopted January 1, 2008. The Company did
not elect the Fair Value Option for any of its financial assets or
liabilities, and therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 had no impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
NOTE 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
The
following table presents certain information about the Company’s
acquired intangible assets as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
All intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful
lives, as indicated below, with no estimated residual values.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata |
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of
|
|
Charge on
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sol Logic Assets
|
|
Sol Logic
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Purchase
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
During Three
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Balance at
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Accounting
|
|
Assets Recorded
|
|
Net Balance at
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Net Balance at
|
|
| |
|
Amortization
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Contingency
|
|
at December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Period
|
|
2007
|
|
During 2008
|
|
Resolution
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2009 |
|
2009
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
5 years
|
|
$
|
2,018
|
|
$
|
(420
|
)
|
$
|
(940
|
)
|
$
|
(658
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark and Trade names
|
|
14.5 years
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
$
|
106
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationship
|
|
5 years
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Compete Agreement
|
|
3 years
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
4 years
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
$
|
(525
|
)
|
$
|
(1,060
|
)
|
$
|
(742
|
)
|
$
|
110
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
$
|
106
|
|
In
December 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of
substantially all the assets of Sol Logic, Inc. resulting in
acquired intangible assets of approximately $2,311,000. Based
on fair value methodologies, the Company recorded approximately
$2,018,000 in intangibles assets for developed technology, $93,000 in
customer relationship intangible assets and $200,000 for a non-compete
agreement.
In
2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately
$742,000 related to our intangible assets related to the acquisition of
Sol Logic in 2007. This charge reflects the amount by which
the carrying value of this asset exceeded its estimated fair value
determined by the assets’ future discounted cash flows. The
impairment charge was recorded as a component of Operating expenses in
the consolidated Statement of Operations for 2008. We
recorded no impairment losses for long-lived or intangible assets during
the three months ended March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009, the EPI
trademark and trade name is the Company’s only remaining definite-lived
intangible asset.
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 are as
follows:
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
BBa
Balance of Goodwill as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
4,452
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Goo
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Don
Derecognition of goodwill resulting from amended purchase accounting
agreement
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Bala
Balance of Goodwill as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,416
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
De- Goodwill
acquired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Im Impairment
losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Bala
Balance of Goodwill as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,416
|
|
In
December 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of
substantially all the assets of Sol Logic, Inc. resulting in
goodwill acquired of approximately $1,036,000. On
March 28, 2008, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to
Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement Amendment”) to amend
the Purchase Agreement. The terms of the Purchase Agreement Amendment
resulted in the de-recognition of the goodwill originally recorded of
$1,036,000.
The
Company annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances
indicate a need, tests the carrying amount of goodwill for impairment.
The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of
each year. A two-step impairment test is used to first identify
potential goodwill impairment and then measure the amount of goodwill
impairment loss, if any. These tests were conducted by determining and
comparing the fair value of our reporting units, as defined in SFAS 142,
to the reporting unit’s carrying value. In 2006, we determined that our
only reporting unit is Identity Management. Based on the results of
these impairment tests, we determined that our goodwill assets were not
impaired as of December 31, 2008.
NOTE 6. COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON UNCOMPLETED
CONTRACTS
The
Company recognizes revenues and cost of revenues on long-term, fixed
price contracts involving significant amounts of customization using the
percentage of completion method based on costs incurred to date
compared to total estimated costs at completion. Such amounts
are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 under the caption “Billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contract”.
Costs
and estimated billings on uncompleted contracts and related amounts
billed as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
incurred on uncompleted contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|